*People have to look into matter/events in macro and micro both ways relatively depending upon
the context.*
Walking on the street with the speed of 5 km/hour is our perception but on the basis of what ??
The speed is 5 Kmh surely if an observer is standing on earth.
If the observer is on geostationary orbit the speed would be 1,600+5 Kmh, if he is away from earth's influence it would be 1,08,000+5 Kmh.
If the observer is farther away on Mars, the speed will be relative to the motion of Mars and so on so forth.
If the observer is much farther away in different solar system, for him the speed will be relative to the motion of solar systems. And hence there will be a huge difference in relative speeds.
As we see everything is to be considered as relative, how Macro and Micro level help us to understand things clearly and aid us to take wise and pristine decision.
If I am positioned at moon and only consider the speed of a man walking on the earth in calculation of his position, this would be of no use for me. I won't be able to reach him if I only consider man's walking speed at earth (5 km). To calculate clear position I need to consider earth's relative motion with respect to the moon along with the actual walking speed. Similarly, we need to apply Macro and Micro observance adroitly on various matters as per the requirement, in order to get correct results. Generally, our common sense do this thing for us without
even giving us second thought on routine basis.
For an example, when we see an insect on our food, we usually avoid that food and throw that in the garbage, but what if we are given a Microscope to watch the microbial. Will We abhor our food and permanently abstinate ourselves from food??
No, we have to perceive things differently, and this is why we see people perceiving things/matters differently depending upon several factors.
Many of us believe that Hitler was an evil man, he was evil to the entire society. This is true to our relation, and hence we have made a perception which helped us all to make a combined decision that Hitler and his Nazism was pernicious for society and we suppressed this ideology vehemently.
But was this really hold truth in others perception? How about a blonde ?
To him Nazism, idolize him like a God, promise many salutary benefits, make him feel like heaven on earth? The theory was not at all bad for him. A blonde can live his life happily as ever without a minute problem ever created by Nazism or Hitler. (Relative perception) Similarly, for any other animal on the earth the Nazism had no effect. Even if a buffalo had contemplating mind, it would had no adverse thought about Nazism because Nazism had no effect on him.
Similarly, Nazism had no role in the life of a crocodile. (Relative perception)
Let us assume an ancient alien race, which has been watching us from afar. ? ? To this Nazism is just another human ideology which they have had seen numerous times in past too. This Nazism had no value for them on larger contexts. (Macro level)
But There is not slightest doubt that Nazism was dangerous to the existence of non-blonde i.e.Asians, Africans, Semitic, Mangoloid etc.
Thus, in our case Nazism was really dangerous for Majority, therefore it was suppressed. In similar fashion, we may also mull over such type of ideologies on Macro and Micro level depending upon relative contexts.
The problem occurs sometimes when we become so confused that we are unable to apply right perception in right context and hence fail to reach any decision.
Below example may help exemplify the matter
Suppose origin of Islam and coming of Muhammad as new prophet in Arab had profound affect on local population, it united and electrified Arab world. In relation to the Arab prospect, it was wonderful event and one must applaud such event. The phenomenon suddenly put Arab race from the classification of nomads to a great civilization. But on the other hand, Arab hordes propelled by Islamic doctrinal fuel, devastated entire known Asia/European kingdoms, obliterated numerous societies and civilizations, ideologies and cultures.
What were the perception of those under subjugation, trepidation???
Obviously, BAD.
Even after long centuries of 1,400 years, those outside of Arab faith still perceive Islam as an evil force virulent to their own faith.
In such case how should we see Islam?
What should be the perception we should keep for Islam?
Like Nazism, Islam is wonderful for its Muslim followers, neutral for other animals, even neutral for any Extra Terrestrials but like Nazism, it is also evil for a larger society which is growing less in number as we fail to categorize this issue.
So do we need to go for what majority think about Islam because, many of us will be dangling in between Macro and Micro perception while Islam will continue to do what it suppose to do, unremittingly.
No comments:
Post a Comment